Honeywell HPA6000B vs Winix C610
A spec-only comparison using ENERGY STAR certification data. We have not tested either unit, and features like noise, filter price and build quality are not covered here.
- Cleaning speed: the Honeywell HPA6000B has the higher smoke CADR (257 vs 248 cfm, 4% more).
- Running cost: the Honeywell HPA6000B uses less electricity per ENERGY STAR (207 kWh/yr), about $5.13/yr less at the U.S. average rate (estimate).
- Room size: by AHAM's 2/3 rule, up to about 386 sq ft vs 372 sq ft.
| Honeywell HPA6000B | Winix C610 | |
|---|---|---|
| Smoke CADR (cfm) | 257 | 248 |
| Dust CADR (cfm) | 262 | 252 |
| Pollen CADR (cfm) | 285 | 262 |
| ENERGY STAR room size | 398 sq ft | 384 sq ft |
| AHAM 2/3-rule room size | 386 sq ft | 372 sq ft |
| Annual energy | 207 kWh | 235 kWh |
| Est. electricity/yr (U.S. avg) | $37.90 | $43.03 |
| Smoke CADR per watt | 7.3 | 6.26 |
| Ozone (reported) | 0 ppb | 1 ppb |
| Technology | Fan and Filter | Fan and Filter |
| Filters listed | HEPA, Activated Carbon | HEPA-Type |
| Auto mode | None | Air Quality Sensor |
| Connected | No | Yes |
| Most Efficient | No | No |
| Source | ENERGY STAR record 4005676 | ENERGY STAR record 4514027 |
Purchase price and filter cost are not included (data gap). Electricity estimates use 18.31¢/kWh (EIA).
Open this pair in the compare tool
See Honeywell air purifiers on the manufacturer's site (plain link, not an affiliate link)
See Winix air purifiers on the manufacturer's site (plain link, not an affiliate link)