Medify Air MA-40-V4.0 vs Winix C610
A spec-only comparison using ENERGY STAR certification data. We have not tested either unit, and features like noise, filter price and build quality are not covered here.
- Cleaning speed: the Winix C610 has the higher smoke CADR (248 vs 245 cfm, 1% more).
- Running cost: the Winix C610 uses less electricity per ENERGY STAR (235 kWh/yr), about $4.76/yr less at the U.S. average rate (estimate).
- Room size: by AHAM's 2/3 rule, up to about 368 sq ft vs 372 sq ft.
| Medify Air MA-40-V4.0 | Winix C610 | |
|---|---|---|
| Smoke CADR (cfm) | 245 | 248 |
| Dust CADR (cfm) | 257 | 252 |
| Pollen CADR (cfm) | 263 | 262 |
| ENERGY STAR room size | 380 sq ft | 384 sq ft |
| AHAM 2/3-rule room size | 368 sq ft | 372 sq ft |
| Annual energy | 261 kWh | 235 kWh |
| Est. electricity/yr (U.S. avg) | $47.79 | $43.03 |
| Smoke CADR per watt | 5.53 | 6.26 |
| Ozone (reported) | 0 ppb | 1 ppb |
| Technology | Fan and Filter | Fan and Filter |
| Filters listed | HEPA-Type | HEPA-Type |
| Auto mode | Timer | Air Quality Sensor |
| Connected | No | Yes |
| Most Efficient | No | No |
| Source | ENERGY STAR record 4497354 | ENERGY STAR record 4514027 |
Purchase price and filter cost are not included (data gap). Electricity estimates use 18.31¢/kWh (EIA).
Open this pair in the compare tool
See Medify Air air purifiers on the manufacturer's site (plain link, not an affiliate link)
See Winix air purifiers on the manufacturer's site (plain link, not an affiliate link)