Winix T810 vs Winix C610
A spec-only comparison using ENERGY STAR certification data. We have not tested either unit, and features like noise, filter price and build quality are not covered here.
- Cleaning speed: the Winix T810 has the higher smoke CADR (270 vs 248 cfm, 9% more).
- Running cost: the Winix C610 uses less electricity per ENERGY STAR (235 kWh/yr), about $4.39/yr less at the U.S. average rate (estimate).
- Room size: by AHAM's 2/3 rule, up to about 405 sq ft vs 372 sq ft.
Both sit in ENERGY STAR data as Large rooms (250–349 cfm) / Medium rooms (150–249 cfm) units by smoke CADR. Listed differences: reported ozone is 1.35 ppb vs 1 ppb. Over 5 years at the U.S. average rate, the electricity difference is about $21.97 (estimate).
| Winix T810 | Winix C610 | |
|---|---|---|
| Smoke CADR (cfm) | 270 | 248 |
| Dust CADR (cfm) | 272 | 252 |
| Pollen CADR (cfm) | 277 | 262 |
| ENERGY STAR room size | 419 sq ft | 384 sq ft |
| AHAM 2/3-rule room size | 405 sq ft | 372 sq ft |
| Annual energy | 259 kWh | 235 kWh |
| Est. electricity/yr (U.S. avg) | $47.42 | $43.03 |
| Smoke CADR per watt | 6.14 | 6.26 |
| Ozone (reported) | 1.35 ppb | 1 ppb |
| Technology | Fan and Filter, PlasmaWave | Fan and Filter |
| Filters listed | HEPA | HEPA-Type |
| Auto mode | Air Quality Sensor | Air Quality Sensor |
| Connected | Yes | Yes |
| Most Efficient | No | No |
| Source | ENERGY STAR record 4514026 | ENERGY STAR record 4514027 |
Purchase price and filter cost are not included (data gap). Electricity estimates use 18.31¢/kWh (EIA).
Open this pair in the compare tool
See Winix air purifiers on the manufacturer's site (plain link, not an affiliate link)
See Winix air purifiers on the manufacturer's site (plain link, not an affiliate link)