Coway Airmega ProX vs Cuckoo CAC-F3010FW
A spec-only comparison using ENERGY STAR certification data. We have not tested either unit, and features like noise, filter price and build quality are not covered here.
- Cleaning speed: the Coway Airmega ProX has the higher smoke CADR (577 vs 552 cfm, 5% more).
- Running cost: the Coway Airmega ProX uses less electricity per ENERGY STAR (335 kWh/yr), about $13.00/yr less at the U.S. average rate (estimate).
- Room size: by AHAM's 2/3 rule, up to about 866 sq ft vs 828 sq ft.
| Coway Airmega ProX | Cuckoo CAC-F3010FW | |
|---|---|---|
| Smoke CADR (cfm) | 577 | 552 |
| Dust CADR (cfm) | 586 | 534 |
| Pollen CADR (cfm) | 450 | 450 |
| ENERGY STAR room size | 894 sq ft | 856 sq ft |
| AHAM 2/3-rule room size | 866 sq ft | 828 sq ft |
| Annual energy | 335 kWh | 406 kWh |
| Est. electricity/yr (U.S. avg) | $61.34 | $74.34 |
| Smoke CADR per watt | 10.3 | 8.01 |
| Ozone (reported) | 0 ppb | 0 ppb |
| Technology | Fan and Filter | Fan and Filter |
| Filters listed | HEPA-Type | HEPA-Type |
| Auto mode | Air Quality Sensor | Air Quality Sensor |
| Connected | No | No |
| Most Efficient | Yes | No |
| Source | ENERGY STAR record 4015877 | ENERGY STAR record 4517930 |
Purchase price and filter cost are not included (data gap). Electricity estimates use 18.31¢/kWh (EIA).
Open this pair in the compare tool
See Coway air purifiers on the manufacturer's site (plain link, not an affiliate link)
See Cuckoo air purifiers on the manufacturer's site (plain link, not an affiliate link)