Cuckoo CAC-AH2810FNW vs Winix Tower XQ
A spec-only comparison using ENERGY STAR certification data. We have not tested either unit, and features like noise, filter price and build quality are not covered here.
- Cleaning speed: the Winix Tower XQ has the higher smoke CADR (461 vs 455 cfm, 1% more).
- Running cost: the Cuckoo CAC-AH2810FNW uses less electricity per ENERGY STAR (388 kWh/yr), about $17.94/yr less at the U.S. average rate (estimate).
- Room size: by AHAM's 2/3 rule, up to about 682 sq ft vs 692 sq ft.
Both sit in ENERGY STAR data as Extra-large rooms (350+ cfm) units by smoke CADR. Listed differences: only the Winix Tower XQ is listed as connected (app/Wi-Fi); reported ozone is 0 ppb vs 1 ppb. Over 5 years at the U.S. average rate, the electricity difference is about $89.72 (estimate).
| Cuckoo CAC-AH2810FNW | Winix Tower XQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Smoke CADR (cfm) | 455 | 461 |
| Dust CADR (cfm) | 466 | 482 |
| Pollen CADR (cfm) | 450 | 450 |
| ENERGY STAR room size | 705 sq ft | 715 sq ft |
| AHAM 2/3-rule room size | 682 sq ft | 692 sq ft |
| Annual energy | 388 kWh | 486 kWh |
| Est. electricity/yr (U.S. avg) | $71.04 | $88.99 |
| Smoke CADR per watt | 6.91 | 5.59 |
| Ozone (reported) | 0 ppb | 1 ppb |
| Technology | Fan and Filter | Fan and Filter |
| Filters listed | HEPA-Type | HEPA |
| Auto mode | Air Quality Sensor | Air Quality Sensor |
| Connected | No | Yes |
| Most Efficient | No | No |
| Source | ENERGY STAR record 4528788 | ENERGY STAR record 4572714 |
Purchase price and filter cost are not included (data gap). Electricity estimates use 18.31¢/kWh (EIA).
Open this pair in the compare tool
See Cuckoo air purifiers on the manufacturer's site (plain link, not an affiliate link)
See Winix air purifiers on the manufacturer's site (plain link, not an affiliate link)